nuts

More trouble for bees

August 12, 2025 By EarthWise Leave a Comment

Honeybees are a critical resource for American agriculture. The western honeybee, Apis mellifera, pollinates more than 130 types of nuts, fruits, and vegetables, adding up to $15 billion worth of crops every year. Honeybee health has been harmed by a combination of factors: weather extremes, habitat loss, pesticides, and disease. One of the biggest problems has been a parasite called varroa destructor, which is a Southeast Asian mite that first entered the United States in the 1980s. The mites spread viruses to the bees.

The past year has been a particularly bad one for the bees. Nearly 56% of managed honeybee colonies died off in the past year, the worst rate since annual reporting began in 2011.

Even while American beekeepers seek solutions to the varroa problem, a potentially worse threat is on the horizon. Another Southeast Asian mite, tropilaelaps, has been making its way across Asia and into Europe. If these mites arrive in North America, the results would be disastrous, wreaking havoc on honeybees and ravaging the nation’s food supply.

Western honeybees are the only honeybee species that is not native to Southeast Asia. As the cradle of development of the bees, Southeast Asia has given rise to a bounty of parasites and viruses that are dependent upon them. In turn, bees native to that region have had time to evolve defenses against these pathogens. Western honeybees have not.

Beekeepers and authorities are taking measures to delay or prevent the arrival of tropilaelaps mites. The stakes are very high.

**********

Web Links

After Devastating Winter Losses, Another Threat Looms for U.S. Beekeepers

Photo, posted April 14, 2013, courtesy of Paul Rollings via Flickr.

Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio

Forest-based agroforestry

July 30, 2025 By EarthWise Leave a Comment

Tree plantings have become a go-to climate solution for governments and conservation groups due to the carbon-storing potential of trees. While planting new trees on open farmland would help capture additional carbon, a new study led by scientists from Yale School of the Environment suggests a powerful alternative: forest-based agroforestry.

Instead of clearing land for crops or starting fresh with new trees, forest-based agroforestry (or FAF) brings agriculture into existing forests. Think fruits, nuts, and medicinal plants, for example, grown sustainably under a forest canopy – all while maintaining biodiversity and storing carbon.

According to the researchers, human activity in forests is often seen as harmful. But for thousands of years, Indigenous and local communities have managed forests in ways that actually strengthen them.

The study, which was recently published in the journal Nature Climate Change, found that FAF not only rivals tree planting in terms of climate benefits, but it can also generate income and support cultural practices tied to the land.

Despite these benefits, forest-based agroforestry receives far less funding and policy support due to two key misconceptions. It’s frequently confused with industrial systems focused on global commodity crops, and results from tropical regions are wrongly assumed to apply to temperate and boreal forests.

The researchers recommend including FAF in agroforestry policies, clearly distinguishing it from harmful industrial practices, and expanding research on FAF in temperate and boreal regions to guide better land management.

Forest-based agroforestry appears to be a natural climate solution hiding in plain sight.

**********

Web Links

Agriculture in Forests Can Provide Climate and Economic Dividends

Photo, posted May 8, 2023, courtesy of Preston Keres / USDA Forest Service via Flickr.

Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio

Small changes can yield big results

March 29, 2024 By EarthWise Leave a Comment

Global food production is one of the largest contributors to climate change. In fact, one-quarter of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions result from food production and agriculture. Be that as it may, we still have to eat. But what we choose to eat has a major impact on the environment.

According to a new study by researchers at McGill University in Canada and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the U.K., partially replacing red and processed meat with plant-based proteins can increase lifespan and mitigate climate change.

In the study, which was recently published in the journal Nature Food, the researchers drew data from a national nutrition survey to analyze Canadians’ dietary records. The study modeled partial replacements (25% and 50%) of either red and processed meat or dairy with plant protein foods like nuts, seeds, legumes, and tofu, on a combination of nutrition, health, and climate outcomes.

In the study, the researchers found that a person’s diet-related carbon footprint plummets by 25% when they replace half of their intake of red and processed meats with plant protein foods. However, dairy substitutions showed smaller reductions of up to just 5%.

Meat and dairy-rich diets are known to increase the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and certain cancers. The researchers also estimated that if half of the red and processed meat in a person’s diet was replaced with plant protein foods, life expectancy would increase nearly nine months on average, due to a reduced risk of chronic disease.

The research team hopes its findings will help people make healthier and more sustainable food choices.

**********

Web Links

Food production is responsible for one-quarter of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions

Small dietary changes can cut your carbon footprint by 25%

Photo, posted November 24, 2019, courtesy of Theo Crazzolara via Flickr.

Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio

Crops May Need To Move | Earth Wise

October 5, 2020 By EarthWise Leave a Comment

California has unique micro-climate diversity that creates ideal growing conditions for a wide range of crops. One third of the vegetables and two-thirds of the fruits and nuts we eat in this country are grown on the more than 76,000 farms in California. But as the climate continues to change, many farmers have started to worry about where and when crops can be grown in the future. Within the next 20 years or so, some parts of California may become too hot and dry to sustain agricultural production.

According to new research from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, by the years 2045-2049, warmer temperatures will have a significant effect on cool-season crops such as broccoli and lettuce such that their growing season will need to shift. On the other hand, warm-season crops like cantaloupe, tomatoes, and carrots will need to move to entirely new growing locations.

The study looked at five key crops that are produced more in California than elsewhere and studied the climate conditions under which they prosper and those under which they fail. They established the range of conditions for which the crops can remain successful. Finally they looked at climate projections for various parts of the state.

California’s agriculture is an essential part of our food security, so it is important to predict how future warming will affect when and where crops can be grown. Changing these things presents challenges. For example, when considering relocating crops, growers have specialized knowledge of their land and their crops. If crops need to move to a new area, either the farmers have to move to that area, or they have to grow a different crop. Either way, it presents a practical and economic burden on the farmer.

**********

Web Links

Some of America’s Favorite Produce Crops May Need to Get a Move On by 2045

Photo, posted June 16, 2011, courtesy of the U.S. Department of Agriculture via Flickr.

Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

Food Production And Climate Change

January 29, 2019 By EarthWise Leave a Comment

According to a University of Oxford study recently published in the journal Science, food production is a major driver of climate change as it’s responsible for 26% of all greenhouse gas emissions. But the research team found that the environmental impact of different foods varied greatly.

Meat and other animal products are responsible for 58% of all food-related greenhouse gas emissions, despite only providing approximately one-fifth of the calories we consume. The researchers found that beef and lamb in particular have the most damaging effect on the planet, responsible for half of all greenhouse gas emissions from animal agriculture.

These findings echo recommendations from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change about how individuals can reduce their carbon footprint through diet. The IPCC suggests we consume less meat and dairy products, consume more locally-sourced seasonal foods, and throw less food in the trash.

Avoiding meat and dairy products can reduce an individual’s carbon footprint from food by two-thirds. The effects of doing so include everything from conserving water and preserving biodiversity to reducing pollution and deforestation.

Interestingly, the same food can have major differences in terms of environmental impacts. For example, beef raised on deforested land is responsible for 12 times as many greenhouse gas emissions as that raised on natural pastures. But even the most climate-friendly meat options are still responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than the highest-impact vegetable proteins, like beans and nuts.

Big differences can also be made by avoiding chocolate and coffee produced from deforested lands.

To learn more about the climate impact of your diet, follow the link to the ‘Climate Change Food Calculator’ on our website: Earth-Wise-Radio.org.

**********

Web Links

Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers

Climate change food calculator

Photo, posted June 21, 2011, courtesy of USDA NRCS Montana via Flickr.

Earth Wise is a production of WAMC Northeast Public Radio.

Dietary Diversity And Health

September 26, 2018 By EarthWise Leave a Comment

For decades, we have heard from public health sources that we should eat a variety of foods. Dietary diversity is touted as important for health. However, there has never really been a consensus about what so-called dietary diversity actually is, how it is measured, or how it necessarily is healthy.